help employment is a particularly strong
coincident economic indicator when the
economy is emerging from a recession.
Just a week after the association’s
results were published, the ASA Staffing
Index troughed. The index showed that
staffing employment reached its lowest
point the week of June 29 through
July 5, 2009 (see Figure 2). Thereafter,
sustained growth in staffing employment ensued. The recession had ended
(as confirmed 15 months later by the
business cycle dating committee of the
National Bureau of Economic Research,
the nongovernmental body that decides
when recessions begin and end).
The ASA Staffing Index provides a
near real-time gauge of staffing industry
employment and overall economic
activity. It tracks weekly changes in
temporary and contract employment,
with results reported nine days after the
close of a work week (see the sidebar
“Methodology of ASA Economic
Surveys,” on page 46).
Staffing as an Employment Indicator
ASA analysis of government data
shows that temporary help employment
is a strong coincident economic indicator
when the economy is emerging from a
recession. Additionally, staffing jobs are
a leading employment indicator. Changes
in staffing job numbers usually precede
changes in overall nonfarm employment
(excluding temporary help) by one to
two quarters. Based on the 1972 through
2008 data, the relationship was strongest with staffing jobs leading nonfarm
employment by two quarters during
periods of normal economic growth.
When the economy was emerging from
a recession, staffing jobs were a modest
one-quarter leading indicator of overall
job growth. All things considered,
staffing employment has historically
been a solid leading indicator of nonfarm
employment by three to six months.
What’s happened since the end of the
Great Recession?
Using BLS seasonally adjusted data
(which had been used in the analysis),
staffing job growth was first detected in
September 2009.7 Nonfarm employment
began an upward trend six months later,
in March 2010.8 ➤
52 Weeks of ASA Staffing Index: June 2006 (When the Index Was Introduced at 100) Through July 2011
110
Figure 2: Staffing Employment Is Usually Cyclical, Lowest at the Beginning of the Year and Highest Toward the End. The
Pattern Exhibited in 2007 Was Most Typical. The 2010 Pattern Was Similar, But the Rate of Growth Was Much Stronger
Than Usual.
2007
100
2006
90
2011
2008
2010
80
2009
70
Source: American Staffing Association
60
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1